Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Dare v. . Howell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 10, 1916, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendants to reconvene and meet with Clarence E. Dare, as town superintendent of highways, and enter into an agreement, pursuant to the provisions of section 105 of the Highway Law of the state of New York.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 10, 1916, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendants to reconvene and meet with Clarence E. Dare, as town superintendent of highways, and enter into an agreement, pursuant to the provisions of section 105 of the Highway Law of the state of New York. The petitioner, Clarence E. Dare, claims to have been duly elected town superintendent of highways of the town of Brookhaven at the biennial town election held…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscook, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddebaoic, Hogan, Oardozo and Pound, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lane v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Hiscox v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API