Legal Opinion

Muscoda State Bank v. Kolar

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jones, J..

This is an action by a bank claiming to be the holder in due course of a promissory note bearing the defendant’s signature. The defendant claims that he never signed a note and that there was no negligence upon his part in not discovering the fraud by which his signature was obtained to the note in question.

The defendant in March, 1920, contracted to purchase for $450 three sows, from the Pedigree Swine Association, Inc., which were warranted “bred and safe in pig to first class boars.” The portion of the agreement most material was as follows:

“The party of the first part further…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Mendota Club v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. McNamara v. GargettMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Twentieth Century Co. v. QuillingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First & Lumbermen's National Bank v. BuchholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Mortgage Associates, Inc. v. SiverhusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. New Jersey Mortgage & Investment Co. v. DorseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. NJ MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. DorseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API