Legal Opinion

Dixie Fire & Casualty Co. v. Esso Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 23, 1965No. 696PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff assigns as error the ruling that the facts alleged in the complaint do not constitute as against the original defendants, Esso, a cause of action sounding in tort.

The ultimate facts stated are sufficient, if established, to support a finding that Head, the sublessee, was negligent and his negligence was a proximate cause of the damage to the building. Only the facts which constitute the negligence and the facts which establish such negligence as a proximate cause of the damage need be stated. There is no requirement that the pleader state its conclusions. On demurrer only facts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. BostwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hill v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Barkhaus v. Producers Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Shives v. SampleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Moore v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Firemen's Mutual Insurance v. High Point Sprinkler Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Rizzuto v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Stanford v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Lustig v. U. M. C. Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API