Legal Opinion

Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 8, 1980No. 73-58-PENCEPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

(“CORRECTED” * ) DECISION

PENCE, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

On May 5,1961 Application Ser. No. 106,-146 was filed in the United States Patent Office as a continuation in part (c.i.p.) of a prior co-pending Application Ser. No. 31,236 as filed May 23, 1960. The application listed Robert E. Blackwood, Hans H. Rennhard, John J. Beereboom, and Charles R. Stephens, Jr., inventors, as assignors to Charles R. Pfizer & Co., Inc. of New York, N. Y., a Delaware corporation A The application was for a patent on 6-deoxytetracy-cline derivatives and process. It was not until over five years later, on August…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust Actions. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. 3M Unitek Corp. v. Ormco Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API