McDonald v. Place
Supreme Court of Vermont
General Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue. 'Heard on the report of a referee at the September Term, 1913, Washington County, Stanton, J., presiding. Judgment for the defendant to recover his costs. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the ease.
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
This is an action of general assumpsit brought by the plaintiff as receiver of the Sutherland Granite Company. The general issue was filed and the case was referred. Upon consideration of the referee’s report judgment 'was rendered for the defendant to recover his costs. The plaintiff had an exception to this judgment.
The Sutherland Granite Company is a corporation organized by voluntary association, its articles of association having been *81filed in the office of the Secretary of State, January 28, 1909. Its office and place of business was to be at Water bury, and its articles of association…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sartwell v. SowlesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
- Strong, Whitney & Co. v. DoddsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875
- Battell v. MatotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
- Armstrong v. ColbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1875
- Montgomery v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunbar v. Farnum WifeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- In Re the Estate of DelliganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- Rutland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Taplin v. Hinckley Fibre Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Pike Industries, Inc. v. Middlebury AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.