Legal Opinion
Pike Industries, Inc. v. Middlebury Associates
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 11, 1979No. 57-78PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, C.J.
All parties to this litigation concede that the plaintiff, Pike Industries, Inc., has not been paid for paving work done as a subcontractor on a shopping center construction project. The lack of payment, according to the findings, is not based on any challenge as to the quality of the plaintiff’s work. The key question relates to determining which party is responsible for making payment to the plaintiff, the general contractor, R. E. Bean Construction Company, or the owner/developer, a pair of companies, Middlebury Associates, and Middlebury Developers, Inc. These parties are all defendants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prince George's County v. Washington Post Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Pocket v. AlmonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Couture v. LowerySupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
- Enos v. Owens Slate Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Troy v. HanifinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- R. E. Bean Construction Co. v. Middlebury Associates & Middlebury Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Contractor's Crane Service, Inc. v. Vermont Whey Abatement AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Lee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1976
- Pike Industries, Inc. v. Middlebury AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- R. E. Bean Construction Company, Inc. v. Middlebury Associates & Middlebury Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.