Legal Opinion
Cox v. Galazin
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 9, 2006No. Civ. 3:03CV01140(AWT)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THOMPSON, District Judge.
Nolan O. Cox (“Cox”) filed this action against Darren Galazin (“Galazin”), Dave Pyzewski (“Pyzewski”), the Stamford, Connecticut Area Local American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO (“Local 240”), and the American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO (“APWU”) in a five-count Amended Complaint. The defendants have moved for summary judgment on all counts of the Amended Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is being granted.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Cox served as president of Local 240 for a period…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Skakel v. GraceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Wolinsky v. Standard Oil of Connecticut, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Fells v. Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- Gleason v. SmolinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
- Sarah Lipkin v. Velma GeorgeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026