Legal Opinion · Dissent

People's Appliance, Inc. v. City of Flint

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1959No. Docket 57, Calendar 47,126Published

1DissentVoelker, J.

I find this ordinance bad for so many reasons that I scarcely know where to begin. I think this ordinance is bad for at least 4 reasons: (1), that it is unreasonably .discrim- *49. inatory, irrespective of any possible State statute on the subject; (2) that it is unreasonably discrim- ■ inatory, because of and with particular reference to an existing and controlling State statute on the subject; (3) that it is invalid because it fatally contravenes and conflicts with an existing State statute covering the same subject; and (4) that it is bad and void because the penalty prescribed is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. In re FrazerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Meek v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Noey v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Richards v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API