People's Appliance, Inc. v. City of Flint
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentVoelker, J.
I find this ordinance bad for so many reasons that I scarcely know where to begin. I think this ordinance is bad for at least 4 reasons: (1), that it is unreasonably .discrim- *49. inatory, irrespective of any possible State statute on the subject; (2) that it is unreasonably discrim- ■ inatory, because of and with particular reference to an existing and controlling State statute on the subject; (3) that it is invalid because it fatally contravenes and conflicts with an existing State statute covering the same subject; and (4) that it is bad and void because the penalty prescribed is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- In re FrazerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Meek v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Noey v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Richards v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.