Legal Opinion

Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Kentucky Public Service Commission

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided February 22, 2010No. Civil Action 3:08-07-DCRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge.

Plaintiff BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., doing business as AT & T Kentucky (AT & T Kentucky), seeks declaratory and injunctive relief from decisions of Defendant Kentucky Public Service Commission (the Commission). SouthEast Telephone, Inc. (SouthEast) and Competitive Carriers of the South, Inc. (CompSouth) intervened as defendants pursuant to Rule 24(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and argue in support the Commission’s findings. For the reasons discussed below the Court will grant, in part, and deny, in part, the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Randy BIBBO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Kentucky Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. BellSouth Telecommunications v. Kentucky Public Service Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API