Legal Opinion

Casey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 16, 2001No. CR-98-1661PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Application for Rehearing.

This court's opinion of April 28, 2000, is hereby withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.

The appellant, Nathan Casey, appeals from the trial court's denial of his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for postconviction relief. The appellant was convicted, on December 7, 1982, of first-degree robbery, and the trial court sentenced him as a habitual offender to life imprisonment without parole. On appeal, this court affirmed his conviction and his sentence. Casey v. State, 456 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984).

The appellant then filed his first Rule 32…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Carlesi v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. People v. BiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  5. Blount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CaseySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. Casey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. Ex Parte CaseySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API