Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Casey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 22, 2002No. 1001555PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Court granted certiorari review to determine whether convictions as to which a "full" pardon has been given can be used for sentence-enhancement purposes under the Habitual Felony Offender Act. We hold that a full pardon precludes such use of the pardoned convictions. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, and we remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

In 1982, Nathan Casey was convicted of first-degree robbery and was sentenced as a habitual offender to life imprisonment without parole. His sentence was enhanced upon application…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ginn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  2. Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  3. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  4. State v. WinklerIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Scott v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API