Legal Opinion

Casey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 16, 2001No. CR-98-1661Published

1Opinion of the Court

852 So.2d 168 (2001)

Nathan CASEY

v.

STATE.

CR-98-1661.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 16, 2001.

Rehearing Denied May 18, 2001.

Nathan Casey, pro se.

William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Yvonne A.H. Saxon, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

On Application for Rehearing

McMILLAN, Presiding Judge.

This court's opinion of April 28, 2000, is hereby withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.

The appellant, Nathan Casey, appeals from the trial court's denial of his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for postconviction relief. The appellant was convicted, on December 7, 1982, of first-degree…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Carlesi v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. People v. BiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  5. Blount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API