Legal Opinion

Zebco v. Houston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1990No. 72613PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*246OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.

The issues to be decided on certiorari are 1) whether the medical opinion upon which claimant’s award is based lacks probative value and, if so, 2) whether the claimant should be afforded another opportunity to prove her claim. We answer both questions in the affirmative.

The claimant seeks disability compensation for respiratory impairment from inhalation of air pollutants at the workplace. Concluding that her breathing functions are impaired, the claimant’s physician testified by both letter-report and deposition her condition resulted from exposure to a “spray,”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Sun Refinery and MarketingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Bostick Tank Truck Service v. NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. City of Nichols Hills v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Utica Square Salon of Beauty v. BarronCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Oklahoma Steel Castings Co. v. CatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Scruggs v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Hammons v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. SHEPARD v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. Protein Technologies International/Ralston Purina v. HammockCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API