Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Fredenberger v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1924No. 16316PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

The county court of Clark county overruled the objections of the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company to the application of the county collector and entered judgment for taxes against the property of the railway company, from which the company has appealed.

The taxes involved are the county tax and county highway tax and the road and bridge taxes of the towns of Wabash and York.

The objection made to the county tax and the county highway tax is, that in making the levy the county board did not adopt the report of the finance committee recommending the appropriation and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Browne v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. People ex rel. Fuller v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Landt v. McCulloughIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Ry. Co. v. People ex rel. MoffettIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People ex rel. Holmes v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Pearsall v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People Ex Rel. Olmsted v. Wabash Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People Ex Rel. Brenza v. GilbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People ex rel. Pollock v. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. People Ex Rel. Andrew v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API