Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Village of Piketon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1961No. 222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollier, J.

This appeal on question of law is directed to the ruling of the Common Pleas Court of Pike County sustaining the separate demurrers of the defendants to a third amended petition filed herein and a dismissal of the action, as the plaintiff refused to plead further.

The third amended petition reads, in substance, that the plaintiff is a minor, seven years of age, and the action was brought on her behalf by Harold Ramsey, her father, for damages for personal injuries; that the defendant village of Pike-ton is a municipal corporation, and on July 27, 1958, maintained a water line in Thornton Drive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. RechelOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Chadwick v. Ohio Collieries Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Handiboe v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Handiboe v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Wise v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API