Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. Ohio Collieries Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMauck, J.

Fred A. Chadwick, plaintiff below, filed a third amended petition against the Collieries Company reciting that the company owned and controlled a mine and the grounds connected therewith; that in connection with its operation of the mine it maintained a bathhouse on the premises; that the grounds upon which the mine and bathhouse were located were open and uninclosed, and the public was accustomed, with the concurrence and passive approval of the company, to enter upon the premises for the purpose of transacting business with the employees of the company and for convenient passage to and from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. . the Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Reardon v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Frewen v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Morrison v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Douglas v. BerglandMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wiley v. National Garages, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Elliman v. GombarOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Ramsey v. Village of PiketonOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Fuller-Brown v. Ken She, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API