Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Cleveland Heights/University Heights School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1995No. 95-314PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Johnson’s principal contentions are that the court of appeals erred in determining that her employment rights were governed by the collective bargaining agreement and that the agreement’s grievance procedure constituted an adequate remedy at law.

In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, Johnson has to establish (1) a clear legal right to salary credits for her law school courses, (2) a corresponding legal duty on the part of the board to grant her request for increased compensation and back pay, and (3) the lack of an adequate remedy in the ordinary course ,of the law. State ex rel.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Horwitz v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Nichols v. Cuyahoga County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental DisabilitiesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Rollins v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Board of DirectorsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Ridenour v. O'Connell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State ex rel. Walker v. Lancaster City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Heights City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API