Szczotka v. Idelson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment declaring void and usurious a $60,000 note owned by them, as well as a second trust deed securing such obligation on certain motel property belonging to plaintiffs. The judgment also permanently enjoined defendants from seeking the remedy of foreclosure otherwise available to them.
The subject litigation had its genesis in a three-cornered deal occurring in 1959. The pretrial order properly notes that the “case is somewhat complicated.” In October or November of that year, the defendants employed one LaSatier, a real estate broker, to exchange their equity in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marovich v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Popp v. Exchange BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Witty v. ClinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Christian v. California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Anderson v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hollywood National Bank v. International Business MacHines Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Northwestern National Insurance Company v. Anthony J. MaggioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Barclays Discount Bank Ltd. v. Bogharian Bros.District Court, C.D. California · 1983