Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 14, 1932No. Docket No. 8448PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
This is an original proceeding seeking a writ of mandate requiring the respondent court to dismiss an action entitled Schultze v. Morgan.
The petitioner alleges that he is the surviving solvent partner in the ownership and possession of a certain boat named the “Saxon”; that said partnership was composed of Louis Morgan and himself; that Morgan was duly adjudged bankrupt and that petitioner is in possession of and entitled to the possession of said boat for the purpose of liquidation of the partnership affairs; that on January 5, 1927, summons was issued in the case entitled Schultze v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vrooman v. Li Po TaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Modoc Land & Livestock Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Swortfiguer v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Donner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lambert v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Moon v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- National Diversified Services, Inc. v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Dresser v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Frohman v. BonelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.