Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 2007No. 49A02-0604-CV-363PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-Plaintiffs, Austin J. Elliott (Austin), b/n/f William Elliott, and Amber Elliott (Amber), b/n/f William Elliott (collectively, Appellants), appeal the trial court's grant of Partial Summary Judgment in favor of Appellee-Defendant, Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate), finding that Allstate was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Appellants' negligent infliction of emotional distress claims, which arose from witnessing Amanda Elliott's (Amanda) injuries, are subject to the same "each person" limit of lability as Amanda's personal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ayres v. Indian Heights Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Dunn v. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Gates v. RichardsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. AutoXchange. Com, Inc. v. Dreyer and Reinbold, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. WinkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Elliott v. Allstate Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Elliott v. Allstate Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API