Riddle v. State

BURKE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Dorothy Jean Riddle, was convicted of forgery. She challenges that conviction in this appeal. She asserts that there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction under the specific subparagraph of the forgery statute that she was charged with violating. We reverse.

ISSUE

[¶2] Was there sufficient evidence to support Ms, Riddle’s forgery conviction under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3-602(a)(ii) (LexisNexis 2013)?

FACTS

[¶3] The facts of this case are relatively straightforward and, in large measure, undisputed. Ms. Riddle deposited a $4,000 check in a joint…