McCamey v. Epps
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge:
Following his conviction for a meth-related offense, Billy Allen McCamey exhausted his state remedies on claims that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive conflict-free counsel or an impartial jury. The federal magistrate judge, however, conducted its own evidentiary hearing and granted the writ. Based on our review of the state court proceedings alone, we reverse. This result is a function of the high hurdle for collateral review of a “claim that was adjudicated on the merits in state court” under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”),…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brumfield v. CainDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2012
- DeMarco Kelly v. State of MississippiDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2026
- Joseph Blueford v. Timothy Hooper, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Nuckolls v. HallDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020
- Rodriguez v. DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.