Legal Opinion

Associated Transport, Inc. v. City of Syracuse

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.

The plaintiffs, intrastate and interstate motor carriers of freight, bring this action for an injunction permanently enjoining the defendants, City of Syracuse and its officials (hereinafter referred, to as “ Syracuse ”) and the defendants, Village of Solvay and its officials (hereinafter referred to as “ Solvay ”) from enforcing certain ordinances adopted by each municipality. The plaintiffs further seek a judgment declaring that said ordinances are unconstitutional, illegal and void.

The answer of Syracuse and the .amended answer of Solvay put in issue the material allegations of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The People v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. City of New York v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. City of Norton v. LowdenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  4. Leifer v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Associated Transport, Inc. v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. KearseSyracuse City Court · 1968
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn HarborNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Merritt Manor Estates, Inc. v. Village of ElmsfordNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Wiggins v. Town of SomersNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API