Legal Opinion

Tainter v. Broderick Land & Investment Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1918No. S. F. No. 7907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The demurrer to the complaint was properly sustained. The object of the action was to subject to the payment of the plaintiff’s judgment certain real estate standing in the name of the defendant corporation.

The complaint alleges that on June 10, 1908, Dudley was the owner of the property; that Dudley, Upham, and Meigs agreed to organize a corporation for the purpose of saving said property from Dudley’s creditors, and providing that Dudley should remain in possession thereof, and that the title should be transferred to the proposed corporation without consideration, and for the purpose of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Atkinson v. Western Development SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. T W M Homes, Inc. v. Atherwood Realty & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. City of Fresno v. California Highway CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Congress Cigar Co. v. Grau SandovalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1933
  4. Haller v. HallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. In re Liquimatic Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API