Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Haynes

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeae from the Fourth District. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

Terry, C. J. concurring.

Ejectment for a lot in San Francisco. The complaint sets forth a deraignment of title from Hyde, Alcalde of San Francisco, in 1847, through a number of mesne conveyances to the plaintiff. The answer admits the original source of title; but denies that, on the 3d day of June, 1854, when one Sarah Boston, and William Boston, her husband, conveyed the lot to one David Calderwood, they had title to the same, as complaint charges, and defendants therefore deny that the said Sarah and William conveyed the property to David Calderwood. The plaintiff claims in his complaint,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. MorseNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  2. Bequette v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hanson v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Brandt v. AlbersNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Brooks v. TichnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API