Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Tichner

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1863No. 3899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Twelfth Judicial District, San Francisco County.

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

This is an action of ejectment. The plaintiff had judgment and the defendant appealed to the late supreme court, who reversed the judgment and ordered judgment on the findings for the defendants, and afterward this court granted a rehearing. It will be necessary to repeat a few of the facts found by the court below, to give a correct understanding of our views of the law applicable to the case.

On the eighteenth day of September, 1852, Lowell and wife, who resided upon and were in possession of a tract of which the premises in controversy form a part, mortgaged the same to Wingate, to secure…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Boggs v. Fowler & HargraveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Arguello v. EdingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McMullen v. SaundersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API