Legal Opinion

Kikos v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 19, 1981No. Civ. A. 78-70521PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., District Judge.

Defendants, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, AFL-CIO [IBT] and its Local Union No. 299 [299] and Nu-Car Driveaway [Nu-Car] seek a summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.

Plaintiffs claim that 299 and Nu-Car, in violation of the existing collective bargaining agreement, staffed a “checker” position with non-union personnel which caused them “to be laid off and suffer injuries and damages.” Their claim (grievance) was submitted…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Teamsters Local Union No. 957District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  2. Kennard v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  3. McCluskey v. WomackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Stahlman v. Kroger Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1982
  5. Perez v. Dana Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API