In Re Castaneda
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
Petitioner is confined at Folsom state prison following re-imprisonment on a charged parole violation. He seeks a writ of habeas corpus, contending that the Adult Authority has denied him the preliminary hearing required by Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471 [33 L.Ed.2d 484, 92 S.Ct. 2593].
The Morrissey Case
In Morrissey the court held that, under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a parolee is entitled to two separate hearings during “the typical process of parole revocation.” The first hearing is “in the nature of a ‘preliminary hearing’ ” conducted “at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BufordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. CalaisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re BowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re MelendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In re CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.