Legal Opinion

In Re Castaneda

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1973No. Crim. 6832PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JANES, J.

Petitioner is confined at Folsom state prison following re-imprisonment on a charged parole violation. He seeks a writ of habeas corpus, contending that the Adult Authority has denied him the preliminary hearing required by Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471 [33 L.Ed.2d 484, 92 S.Ct. 2593].

The Morrissey Case

In Morrissey the court held that, under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a parolee is entitled to two separate hearings during “the typical process of parole revocation.” The first hearing is “in the nature of a ‘preliminary hearing’ ” conducted “at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BufordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. People v. CalaisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. In Re BowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. In Re MelendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. In re CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API