Legal Opinion
Cepulonis v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 28, 1982No. 79 CV 1216PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Richard Cepulonis, filed this pro se action under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), 1 alleging a seizure and forfeiture of his auto mobile in violation of the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. He seeks declaratory relief and money damages in the amount of the appraised value of the vehicle. 2 By Order dated May 29, 1979, plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The action is now before the Court on motions by both parties for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P. The facts are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jaekel v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- United States v. One 1971 BMW 4-Door SedanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jorge Sarit and Dennie Espaillat v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. BorromeoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Montgomery v. ScottDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Dosunmu v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Jose Rosado-Acha v. William J. Snyder, Director, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and Four Thousand Dollars in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.