Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Watts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 5, 1985No. 84-270PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The only issue raised on our review by certiorari is whether the Court of Criminal Appeals was correct in holding that the defendant, Sharon Watts, could be impeached by a prior inconsistent statement even though she had not been confronted with the statement prior to being impeached.

During the cross examination of Watts, the State began to question her about a statement she had allegedly made on the night of the shooting. Before the substance of the statement was brought out, Watts objected on the grounds that the statement was involuntary, and the state abandoned that line of questioning.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Watts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  2. Ex Parte PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Gober v. KhalafSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Watts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API