Legal Opinion

Salzman v. Electric Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 75 to compel Electric Insurance Company to proceed to arbitration of a claim for underinsured motorist benefits, and action, in effect, for a judgment declaring that the petitioners did not need the consent of Electric Insurance Company in order to settle their underly*769ing automobile accident claim against, among others, the Jewish Community Council of Greater Coney Island, for the sum of $250,000 for each petitioner, in order to preserve their right to seek underinsured motorist benefits, Electric Insurance Company appeals from an order and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Gangel v. DeGrootNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JumaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. TorciviaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glauber v. G & G Quality Clothing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Matter of Progressive Specialty Ins. Co. v. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API