Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Pate
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1883No. 10,728PublishedCited by 16 opinions
From the Ohio Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
— The appellant, claiming to be the owner in fee simple of the undivided one-third of certain described real,estate in Ohio county, brought this action against the appellees to quiet her title, and for possession and partition.
The appellees answered in two paragraphs. The first was the general denial. The appellant demurred to the second; her demurrer was overruled; exception was taken to the rul*424ing; a reply being declined, judgment was rendered for the appellees.
The sustaining of the demurrer to the second paragraph of the answer is the only assignment of error.
The facts stated in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sims v. EverhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Scranton v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Miles v. LingermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Pitcher v. LaycockIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Dob v. AbernathyIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Rosa v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Foster v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Buchanan v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- McClanahan v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.