Kaczynski v. Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
In this action of trespass for negligence, plaintiff recovered a verdict; the court below entered judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto, and plaintiff appeals. The judgment is right.
The facts are these: On a foggy night, plaintiff, while walking down a flight of steps, built and maintained by the city for passage from one of its upper streets to another on a lower level, stepped into a hole on a landing forming part of the flight. The hole was caused by the removal of a nine- or ten-inch plank; she admitted she had known of its absence for approximately three weeks, that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McManamon v. Hanover TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Levitt v. B/G Sandwich Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Purcell v. RiebeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Smith v. Shamokin BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tharp v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Downing v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Bockstoce Et Ux. v. Pittsbgh. Rwys. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- DeFonde v. Keystone Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Scurco v. KartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.