Rabinowitz v. Houk
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
— The suggestion has been made that this Court should of its own motion dismiss this appeal for failure to bring in as joint parties appellant certain co-defendants of the appealing defendant against whom decrees pro confesso had been entered in the court' below upon the theory that the omitted parties are necessary parties to this appeal. I cannot accede to this suggestion.
Neither party has moved this Court to dismiss the appeal. The transcript was filed in this Court over a year ago, and has been exhaustively briefed by counsel on both sides.
C. W. Houk was the complainant in the court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- McDaniel v. McElvySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Masterson v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Hanrick v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Minick v. MinickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Palm Beach Estates v. CrokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. HoltSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Day v. Benesh Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. BrooksSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.