Legal Opinion

Rabinowitz v. Houk

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 20, 1930PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

— The suggestion has been made that this Court should of its own motion dismiss this appeal for failure to bring in as joint parties appellant certain co-defendants of the appealing defendant against whom decrees pro confesso had been entered in the court' below upon the theory that the omitted parties are necessary parties to this appeal. I cannot accede to this suggestion.

Neither party has moved this Court to dismiss the appeal. The transcript was filed in this Court over a year ago, and has been exhaustively briefed by counsel on both sides.

C. W. Houk was the complainant in the court…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. McDaniel v. McElvySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Masterson v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Hanrick v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Minick v. MinickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Palm Beach Estates v. CrokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. HoltSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Day v. Benesh Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. BrooksSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API