Legal Opinion

United States v. Baker

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 25, 1989No. 61,349; ACM 27029PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was remanded to the United States Air Force Court of Military Review for further consideration of sentence appropriateness. 28 MJ 121. That court then reaffirmed the original sentence.

In its per curiam opinion, the court below noted:

Appellate defense counsel argue that a sentence that includes a punitive discharge is excessive given the appellant’s excellent military record and the mitigating circumstances, i.e., marital problems surrounding the offense. They suggest that the “great sums” expended in developing the appellant as a qualified load-master justify giving him an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. AlbrechtU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. JoynerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
  3. United States v. ArnoldU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. CantrellUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  5. United States v. ConwayU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API