Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Conway

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 22, 1994No. ACM 30365Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDixon, Chief Judge

I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that appellant’s plea of guilty to solicitation was provident and that the sentence in this case is appropriate.

Although I have no difficulty concluding appellant’s attempts to persuade his minor stepdaughter to permit him to view her naked body is service discrediting conduct, my interpretation of current military law persuades me the facts here do not support the offense of solicitation. This Court recently held “the offense of solicitation requires that the person being solicited understand the request as one to engage in crime.” United States v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HigginsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. DavisU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API