Legal Opinion
Colkley v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 2, 2021No. 0833/19Published
1Opinion of the Court
Clayton Daman Colkley v. State of Maryland, No. 833, September Term 2019. CRIMINAL LAW > TRIAL; RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE; CROSS- EXAMINATION AND IMPEACHMENT When a hearsay statement has been admitted in evidence, the credibility of the declarant may be attacked, and if attacked may be supported, by any evidence which would be admissible for those purposes if the declarant had testified as a witness. Md. Rule 5-806(a). CRIMINAL LAW > TRIAL; RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE; CROSS- EXAMINATION AND IMPEACHMENT CRIMINAL LAW > EVIDENCE; JUDICIAL NOTICE; RECORDS When a hearsay declarant has a per se impeachable…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- United States v. Benjamin MallahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- United States v. Neil Saada and Isaac Saada, A/K/A ZuckieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.