Legal Opinion

Schieffelin v. Komfort

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff as an elector and taxpayer of this state to restrain the boards of election and the election officials of the state from taking steps preliminary to the nomination and election of delegates to the constitutional convention. Pursuant to section 2 of article 4 of the Constitution of the state, the legislature enacted a law which *681provided for a special election to be held on the first Tuesday in April, 1914, and at which there should be submitted to the electors the question whether a convention could be held to revise and amend the Constitution of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marshall v. DyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. McConaughy v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Brown v. TrousdaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. People Ex Rel. Deister v. . WintermuteNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Boren v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walker v. Oak Cliff Volunteer Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Avon Dairies, Inc. v. Du MondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Caparco v. KaplanNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Dairy Sealed, Inc. v. Ten EyckNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Reimer v. FullenNew York Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API