Legal Opinion

Reimer v. Fullen

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

In this action for a declaratory judgment the plaintiff applies for an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendants from taking any action pursuant to orders made by the Transit Commission of the State of New York on October 7, 1938, and June 26, 1939, and from interfering with the plaintiff’s alleged *56rights in and to a siding maintained between the elevated tracks of the defendant Long Island Railroad Company and the coal yard of the plaintiff facing Atlantic avenue, in the borough of Brooklyn, between Van Siclen avenue and Hendrix street.

The orders of the Transit Commission,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Schieffelin v. Valentine KomfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Schieffelin v. KomfortNew York Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Long Island Rail Road v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API