Legal Opinion
Dan Oliver v. Sd-3c LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 14, 2014No. 12-16421PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
In this antitrust suit, Plaintiffs, purchasers of SD digital memory cards, allege that Defendants Panasonic Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, SanDisk Corporation, and SD -3 C, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) violated federal and state antitrust laws by conspiring to fix the price for SD cards and engaging in improper practices with respect to the licensing of Defendants’ patents to other manufacturers of SD cards. The district court dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims as time-barred. Reviewing de novo, we reverse. Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena, 592…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hartig Drug Co. v. Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Andrew Roberts v. City & County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Steves and Sons, Inc. v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Garrison v. Oracle Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.