State Ex Rel. Nagle v. Kelsey
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
This is an original proceeding in quo warranto brought by the Attorney General on behalf of the state against one Frank T. Kelsey for the purpose of ousting him from office.
At the outset we are here confronted by the contention that this court is without power and devoid of jurisdiction in the instant action. The determination of that question depends upon the following provision of our Constitution: The supreme court “shall have power in its discretion to issue and to hear and determine writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, quo warranto, certiorari, prohibition and injunction, and such other…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- State ex rel. Whiteside v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- State ex rel. Scharnikow v. HoganMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- State ex rel. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Clarke v. MoranMontana Supreme Court · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grossman v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Twin Falls Canal Co. v. HuffIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Wheir v. DyeMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Lynch v. BataniMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Dunn v. AyersMontana Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.