Legal Opinion
Wheir v. Dye
Montana Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1937No. 7,748PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson
This is an original proceeding in this court by the members of the board of county commissioners of Cascade county, the county assessor, and the county treasurer, in their respective official capacities and as individuals, against the members of the State Board of Equalization, as a board, to prohibit or restrain them in their official capacities from putting into effect the provisions of Chapter 72 of the Laws of 1937, relating, in general, to the registration, licensing, and taxation of motor vehicles.
It is asserted in plaintiffs ’ complaint that portions of the Act are unconstitutional…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Stebbins v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Keeney v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Tappan v. Merchants' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Apache County v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Livingstone v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1960
- Smith v. Columbia CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Hammett v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- State ex rel. Conservation Commission v. LePageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.