Keith v. Keith

In this bill in equity, brought while the parties were still married to each other, though living apart, the plaintiff alleges that, “as a result of her . . . earnings and *461work,” she and the defendant “were able to invest substantial amounts” in real estate, bonds, bank deposits, and certain articles of tangible personal property, and, in paragraph five of the bill, that (with no allegation as to time) they “made an agreement to the effect that the parties would share and own said assets one half each.” The material prayers are for an accounting and for general relief.

The judge found “facts…