Legal Opinion

County of Pierce v. Suburban Bank of Elmhurst

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 18, 1993No. 92 C 2082PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MAROVICH, District Judge.

The County of Pierce (“County”) filed suit against the Suburban Bank of Elmhurst (“Bank”) alleging breach of warranty of good title. The County claims damages of $77,-147.11 as a result of the Bank’s failure to obtain all endorsements on a warrant check issued by the County and deposited in an account with the Bank. The Bank moves for summary judgment claiming that the missing endorsement was not the cause of the County’s loss. The Bank further claims that the County failed to give it timely notice of the missing endorsement. For the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Marine National Bank of JacksonvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1969
Great American Insurance Companies v. American State Bank of DickinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
Birmingham Trust National Bank v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

FIRST NAT. BANK IN HARVEY v. Colonial BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995