Legal Opinion

Storrs, Receivers v. Ghingher

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 6, 1934No. [No. 49, January Term, 1934.]Published

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

As receivers, of the United Railways & Electric Company of Baltimore, the appellants have a deposit account of $127,-366.55 with the Baltimore Trust Company, which has been in the custody and control of the bank commissioner of Maryland since March 4th, 1933, under the provisions of the Emergency Banking Act (chapter 46). The object of this: mandamus suit is to require the bank commissioner to pay the receivership deposit account in full as a preferred claim. The trust company is alleged to be insolvent, and is in course' of liquidation. After the appointment of the receivers by the District…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaither v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  2. Friedman v. Hendler Creamery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  3. Diggs v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  4. Ghingher v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Thom v. Baltimore Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API