Legal Opinion

Thom v. Baltimore Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1930No. [Nos. 78, 79, October Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUbateb, J.

The inquiry in this case is whether the appellants, as stockholders of the Baltimore Trust Company, were entitled to exercise the right to purchase a due proportion of a supplemental issue of its capital stock. It was held by the lower court that such a pre-emptive right would exist if the new shares had been intended to he sold for cash, but that, as they were to he issued in payment for property, consisting of the stock of the Rational Union Bank of Maryland, the asserted right was not enforceable. The appeals are from an order and a decree effectuating that conclusion.

The case was heard on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miles v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Brant v. EhlenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  4. Diggs v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. Real Estate Trust Co. v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. McLanahanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  2. Warehime v. WarehimeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Ross Transport, Inc. v. CrothersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Todd v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  5. Dickson v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API