Legal Opinion

Diggs v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1910PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court Ho. 2 of Baltimore City (Hablan, C. J.).

1Opinion of the CourtSchmucker, J.

The proceeding before us is an ex parte one instituted in Circuit Court Eo. 2 of Baltimore City by the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (hereinafter called the Fidelity Company) as trustee under a mortgage deed of trust made to it by the Consolidated Gas Company of Baltimore City (hereinafter called the Gas Company). The purpose of the proceeding is to procure the execution of the trusts of the mortgage under the direction and supervision of the Court.

There is no question that in cases of express trusts the trustee, if in doubt, may, for his protection, apply to a Court of equity for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Keokuk & Western Railroad v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Jones v. Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Bowers v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  5. Toledo, Delphos & Burlington Railroad v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Garner v. Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Leviness v. Consolidated Gas Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  3. Board of Com'rs v. A. V. Wills & SonsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1916
  4. Thom v. Baltimore Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  5. Central Sav. Bank of Balto. v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API