Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lemer v. Koble

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1957No. 7717PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMSON, Chief Justice.

This is an action involving the drainage of surface waters. Plaintiff in his amended complaint states that he is and has been for the last ten years, a farmer and the owner of the East Half (Ej/á) of the Southwest Quarter (SW14), West Half (WJ4) of the Southeast Quarter (SEf4). -and East Half (Ei/i) of the Southeast Quarter (SE14) of Section Four (4), Township One Hundred Fifty-two (152), Range Seventy-six (76), McHenry County, North Dakota; that Jack J. Kuntz is and for sometime past has been the owner of the Northeast Quarter (NEJ4) of Section Nine (9) in said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Soules v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Reichert v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Viestenz v. Arthur TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  4. McHenry County v. BradyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Austad v. DreierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. Boeing CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Huber v. Oliver CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Matter of Estate of RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kadlec v. Greendale Township Board of Township SupervisorsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Knodel v. Kassel TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API