Mathies Coal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentSilvestri, Senior Judge
Because I believe Claimant’s fatal claim petition should be dismissed, I respectfully dissent from the majority. In support thereof, I submit the following.
Mathies Coal Company (Employer) petitioned for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the referee and granted the fatal claim petition of Vickie Lynn Tau (Claimant).
Claimant’s deceased spouse, William P. Tau (Tau), worked for Employer as a utility man in the underground mine of the Employer. The utility man does all the odd jobs and gets “cuts” ready for the other miners. Upon…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Collins v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Hawthorne v. Dravo Corp., Keystone Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.