Legal Opinion

Laurel Mills v. Ward

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1924No. 23644PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for one thousand dollars in favor of appellee Ward as damages for personal injuries received by him while working in the Laurel Mills, on account of negligence in failing to furnish a safe ladder upon which to perform his duties.

Briefly stated the case is this: Ward was employed in the capacity of a pickerman in the cotton mill of appellant. One of his duties was to oil the hanger's, suspending the shafting of one of the machines, which was about thirteen feet above the floor. In order to reach 'the hangers Ward had to climb upon some object and *455pour the oil…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Huyck v. McNerneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Grasselli Chemical Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Puza v. C. Hennecke Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Allen Gravel Co. v. YarbroughMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Wausau Southern Lumber Co. v. CooleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colonna Shipyard, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  2. Kelley v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Rowland v. Reynolds Electrical Engineering Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Middleton v. FaulknerMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Letney v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API